I am now in the stage of contemplating if my decision of studying law is right.
I know that most of you know that I just a happy-go-lucky person who hates reading and studying.
A conventional law student, as they said, should be reading and studying much which I'm not doing. They say that a law student should be studying at least more than 50% of their time which I failed to do.
Yes, I know that I have a lot of time to study. But I'm not really comfortable doing it.
Reading lots of cases...
Memorizing provisions of law...
NO WAY
With that way of attitude, it seems that I can't survive in the Faculty of Civil Law.
I'm just studying 1-2 hours a day and that's it.
In my first year, I don't know why I survived with that kind of study habits considering more that half of my classmates, who studies a lot more than I do, were debarred from UST.
PS: I didn't fail a single subject...
I'm really wondering why.
Maybe, I'm just LUCKY... I'm NOT BRILLIANT anyway...
I repeat... I HATE READING (cases) AND MEMORIZING (provisions).
I can't force myself to do so...
I cannot make myself a conventional law student. I'm trying to do but I really can't do so!
I'm still allowed to drop subjects before August 3rd.
I'm still thinking about it...
Question: Should I really act as a "conventional law student" in order to survive?
No comments:
Post a Comment