Offhandedly, I know that I am the same person because I remember being that person who did this and that yesterday. I can also ask others about regarding yesterday. They will surely remember me having done this and that even if they can’t remember everything that I did yesterday. I must also remember them having known me before today, for me to trust their memory about me.
I mentioned ‘remembering’ as a way of identifying myself of today with myself yesterday. I don’t have to remember everything I did yesterday to know that the person that I was yesterday is essentially the same person today. I need only to remember some things about me. Memory, then, is important for me to be able to identify myself in tomes and places. Complete loss of memory will completely wipe out any notion of self-identity.
I may want to look at the photos of myself when I was a child. But I must remember being that person in the photos despite the obvious changes between the times I was child and today. That child in the photos and I share the same memories. That, I remember. And because I remember that, I know that the child in the photos and I are one and the same person.
I also remember having this body of mine, and also remember that this body is the same as the one yesterday. I obviously have a body. But without memory, I would not be able to recognize it is a mine. It seems that everything that I know about self-identity relies solely on my memory.
Can I distinguish myself from the contents of my memory?
I am able to distinguish myself from the contents of my memory, then, logically speaking, I am not a content of memory, but I am the entity that has a memory.
Is this possible?
Can I know myself apart from my memory, apart from memories of my self I have?
If this is possible, then what am I without turning myself into a content of memory?